Vote in Person if you want to be sure that your vote Counts

 
 
EIPCa et al v Weber et al - Second Amended Complaint to 2021 Lawsuit~Constitutional Challenge
(click here to read it)
 

~ Click here to signup to receive
Email, Newsletters, Bulletins and Articles

~ Click here for Overview of
Accomplishments

~ Click here The Golden State Agenda
(updated March 2025)


Click here to Donate to support our
lawsuits and effort,
fighting to preserve your vote!
Now using Secure Payment Processor Stripe.

 

 

For Immediate Release – September 26, 2024

                 Contact: Linda Paine, EIPCa President
linda@eip-ca.com  (661) 313-5251

California Cannot Provide an Accurate List of Who Voted in Nov 2022.
What are the Implications for Nov 2024? 

 

Nonpartisan watchdog group finds legally required list of voters exceeds official
 results by more than 22,210 voters and 43,000 votes.

 

Santa Clarita, Calif. – A review of the official list of voters and number of votes cast in the CA November 8, 2022 election reveals 43,624 more votes and over 22,000 more voters than the numbers certified by the CA Secretary of State, calling into question the validity of the certification of the 2022 election.

 

Is this a harbinger of things to come in 2024?

 

On June 28, 2024 Election Integrity Project®California (EIPCa)( obtained from the office of the Secretary of State a list of who voted in California’s November 8, 2022 general election. California’s Election Code §2191 provides qualified groups the right to obtain from elections officials a list of each person who voted in previous elections.

 

The list contained each voter’s name, address, birthdate, state Registration ID number, voting method and current registration status (active, inactive, pending, cancelled, etc.) Each Registration ID number in VoteCal is unique, and not duplicated.

 

The list should have been an exact match to the list California certified on December 16, 2022.

It was not!

 

Eligible voters in California should be infuriated!

 

EIPCa sent a letter with the findings listed by county and the method of voting to the Secretary of State on September 6, requesting a timely response to several questions, but has not yet received a response.

 

EIPCa analyzed the Secretary’s list and found:

  • The number of statewide November 8, 2022 votes provided in the list is 43,624 more votes than certified by the Secretary.
  • 21,355 voters had two or three votes credited to their respective Registration ID numbers.
  • If these multi-votes are removed, there were still 22,210 more voters listed than number of votes certified.
  • Analyzing the list by county…
    • Only one county (Modoc) matched the certified county-level results.
    • 32 counties had more votes than certified. Los Angeles County had the bulk of the list’s excess votes and multi-voting.
    • 25 counties had fewer votes than the number certified. It is unclear who cast the “missing” certified votes, as the list contains all who voted in the election even if they were subsequently inactivated or cancelled.

 

“Election results produced through any process that bends or breaks the “rules” deny all legal voters their voice.” (In re Coy) 127 U.S. 731 (1888)

 

“EIPCa calls for Secretary of State Weber to perform a full and final reconciliation of the votes counted compared to eligible voters who voted and to develop a ‘who voted’ list as mandated by EC §2191 prior to certification of each future election, starting with the November, 2024 Presidential election.” said EIPCa President Linda Paine.

 

#  #  #


Election Integrity Project®California (EIPCa) is a nonpartisan nonprofit 501(c)(3) charity.

Contributions are tax-deductible.

pdf of article 

On Your Honor (2025)

Part 3 of 7


June 2, 2025
EIPCa On Your Honor (2025) Part 2 of 7


Part 2 in this “On Your Honor” series broached the topic of voting by mail as perhaps the weakest link in the “on your honor” chain of threats to election integrity in California.

 

The concerns mentioned there are just the tip of the iceberg. There are further considerations:

 

Counties utilize the postal service to mail a ballot to all persons on the voter rolls. Protestations aside, the postal service cannot provide the reliable chain of custody necessary to protect the integrity of the system.

 

  • Most mail carriers and postal workers are honest, but like the population in general, a few are not. This sad reality begs the questions:

     

    • If a postal worker decides to destroy or not deliver ballots, will anyone find out, and if yes, how? 

       

    • How does the post office prevent ballots from being stolen, or delivered to locations where they end up in the wrong hands?    

       

  • Many ballots arrive at dormitories, nursing homes, and homeless shelters. Ideally, the staff at these locations distribute the ballots correctly, making sure they get to the right people, and return unopened the ballots of people who no longer live there. But if bad actors intercept or destroy ballots before they can reach the legitimate voter, will anyone know?

 

  • Problems can also occur at residences when family members or others have passed away, moved, or cannot vote for whatever reason. California essentially ignores the possibility that someone could fill out the ballot of a dead parent, departed roommate, mentally incapacitated family member, or a family member who simply does not care to vote. And because the state does a poor job of verifying signatures, undiscovered forgery becomes a real probability.

 

Why? Because the state has created an entire system that operates outside the view of citizens and observers. 

 

This On Your Honor system BEGS to be manipulated.

 

Please stay tuned for the rest of this On Your Honor article series.


click here for pdf

 

 

 
 

EIPCa Voter Roll Research
Questions Surround Irregularities in California’s 2020 Election

Nonpartisan watchdog seeks answers on over 2 million documented registration and voting anomalies.


Santa Clarita, California (June 22, 2021)Click here to download copy of press release-- California’s November 3, 2020 election was marred by significant voting and registration irregularities, according to Election Integrity Project® California, Inc. (EIPCa). The non-partisan organization analyzed the state’s official voter list of February 9, 2021 and reported its findings to California’s Secretary of State Shirley Weber on June 17, 2021. This followed EIPCa reports of 2020 cross-state voting on April 30 and May 18, 2021 that the Secretary has ignored. EIPCa’s June report cites California’s election code that requires officials to provide timely answers to citizens’ questions.

EIPCa seeks answers to the following questions, on behalf of California voters:

  1. Why are there almost 124,000 more votes counted in California’s November 3, 2020 election than voters recorded as voting in that election? And why is most of the discrepancy driven by 116,000 vote-by-mail ballots with no apparent voter identified in VoteCal’s voting histories? Click for a list by county.
  2. Why do more than 7,700 voters have TWO November 3, 2020 votes credited to their voting histories? These are two votes credited to each of 7,700 unique (non-duplicated) registration ID numbers in the state database. This indicates mass double voting, a significant programming error in the state’s registration system, or both.
  3. Why does California have 1.8 million more registered voters than eligible citizens and why did this overage rise 72% in the 2020 election cycle? Click for a list by county.

VoteCal Database Date # Counties with Registrations Exceeding # Eligible Citizens Total Ineligible Registrations
March 2020 11 1,063,957
February 2021 23 1,834,789 (+72% since 3/20)
  1. Why did California’s on-line and DMV registration systems change 33,000 foreign-born voters’ birthplaces of record to “California” or “United States”, potentially masking non-citizens unlawfully registered to vote? Similarly, why were 76,000 birthplaces changed from another U.S. state to California? Click for a chart of birthplace changes.

“Many in the nation are questioning the validity of the 2020 general election in their states”, said EIPCa President Linda Paine. “Mass irregularities in California’s registration and voting numbers continue to erode voter confidence here and we are hopeful Secretary Weber will immediately address our questions.”

 


 
 
Receive the Most Current Information. Click here to Sign Up for the EIPCa Newsletter.